<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eclipse just crashed so I&#8217;m going to file a bug now&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Juma</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5820</link>
		<author>Ismael Juma</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5820</guid>
		<description>Just released, JDK6u10 build 27:

http://blogs.sun.com/SDNProgramNews/entry/java_se_6u10_27_is

It should include the fix.

Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just released, JDK6u10 build 27:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/SDNProgramNews/entry/java_se_6u10_27_is" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/SDNProgramNews/entry/java_se_6u10_27_is</a></p>
<p>It should include the fix.</p>
<p>Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Juma</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5816</link>
		<author>Ismael Juma</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5816</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, it's not, but I haven't tried. Still waiting for the JDK6u10 beta that actually includes the fix...

Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, it&#8217;s not, but I haven&#8217;t tried. Still waiting for the JDK6u10 beta that actually includes the fix&#8230;</p>
<p>Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Le Berre</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5788</link>
		<author>Daniel Le Berre</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5788</guid>
		<description>Sun Java 6 update 7 is now available for download.

Does anyone know if the hotspot bug is corrected in this update?

I cannot figure it out on the release notes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun Java 6 update 7 is now available for download.</p>
<p>Does anyone know if the hotspot bug is corrected in this update?</p>
<p>I cannot figure it out on the release notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Bokowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5654</link>
		<author>Boris Bokowski</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5654</guid>
		<description>Martin, see bug 214092 comment 13. The JIT in IBM's J9 VM has similar command-line options for excluding certain methods from being optimized too much, or being JITed at all (see e.g. bug 215252 comment 20).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, see bug 214092 comment 13. The JIT in IBM&#8217;s J9 VM has similar command-line options for excluding certain methods from being optimized too much, or being JITed at all (see e.g. bug 215252 comment 20).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Oberhuber</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5638</link>
		<author>Martin Oberhuber</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5638</guid>
		<description>Just wondering, how would one exclude classes from the scope of the Hotspot Compiler?

And just noting, one little bugzilla "trick" that I've been using a lot in order to see if an issue of mine has been filed already before is this:

   Copy an interesting line from a backtrace related to the bug (e.g. from a .log file, or from a hs_err*.log file)
   Open the bugzilla advanced search page: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/query.cgi?format=advanced 
   Paste the line of backtrace into the "A comment:" field, select Classification: "Eclipse", and press the Search button


You'll find those bugzilla bugs that were filed with probably related backtraces. Just FYI, there've been ideas to automate that kind of search with an Eclipse "Help &#62; Report a Bug" menu item that would automatically search bugzilla for tracebacks from your .log and automatically attach your .log when you report an issue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering, how would one exclude classes from the scope of the Hotspot Compiler?</p>
<p>And just noting, one little bugzilla &#8220;trick&#8221; that I&#8217;ve been using a lot in order to see if an issue of mine has been filed already before is this:</p>
<p>   Copy an interesting line from a backtrace related to the bug (e.g. from a .log file, or from a hs_err*.log file)<br />
   Open the bugzilla advanced search page: <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/query.cgi?format=advanced" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/query.cgi?format=advanced</a><br />
   Paste the line of backtrace into the &#8220;A comment:&#8221; field, select Classification: &#8220;Eclipse&#8221;, and press the Search button</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll find those bugzilla bugs that were filed with probably related backtraces. Just FYI, there&#8217;ve been ideas to automate that kind of search with an Eclipse &#8220;Help &gt; Report a Bug&#8221; menu item that would automatically search bugzilla for tracebacks from your .log and automatically attach your .log when you report an issue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Le Berre</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5620</link>
		<author>Daniel Le Berre</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5620</guid>
		<description>Remi: Using a Java 5 JVM until the new JVM 6 update appears looks like a good option to me. Thanks for clarifying this.

I basically use Eclipse for two main tasks: my courses on software engineering and JEE, and SAT4J development :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remi: Using a Java 5 JVM until the new JVM 6 update appears looks like a good option to me. Thanks for clarifying this.</p>
<p>I basically use Eclipse for two main tasks: my courses on software engineering and JEE, and SAT4J development :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5619</link>
		<author>Remy</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5619</guid>
		<description>Daniel: Yes, the two known workarounds at the moment are to either use Java 5 or to exclude those classes. I hope that this will be the end of your Eclipse problems for the time being. Good luck with whatever you're using Eclipse for! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel: Yes, the two known workarounds at the moment are to either use Java 5 or to exclude those classes. I hope that this will be the end of your Eclipse problems for the time being. Good luck with whatever you&#8217;re using Eclipse for! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Le Berre</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5614</link>
		<author>Daniel Le Berre</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5614</guid>
		<description>The problem is the famous DeltaTreeNode problem:

From my JVM error log file:
Current CompileTask:
C2:825      org.eclipse.core.internal.dtree.DataTreeNode.forwardDeltaWith([Lorg/
eclipse/core/internal/dtree/AbstractDataTreeNode;[Lorg/eclipse/core/internal/dtr
ee/AbstractDataTreeNode;Lorg/eclipse/core/internal/dtree/IComparator;)[Lorg/eclipse/core/internal/dtree/AbstractDataTreeNode; (
469 bytes)

It looks like the fix it to exlude those classes from the scope of the Hotspot Compiler or to wait for the new update of Sun JVM.

Thanks for pointing us to the right direction!

Cheers,

Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is the famous DeltaTreeNode problem:</p>
<p>From my JVM error log file:<br />
Current CompileTask:<br />
C2:825      org.eclipse.core.internal.dtree.DataTreeNode.forwardDeltaWith([Lorg/<br />
eclipse/core/internal/dtree/AbstractDataTreeNode;[Lorg/eclipse/core/internal/dtr<br />
ee/AbstractDataTreeNode;Lorg/eclipse/core/internal/dtree/IComparator;)[Lorg/eclipse/core/internal/dtree/AbstractDataTreeNode; (<br />
469 bytes)</p>
<p>It looks like the fix it to exlude those classes from the scope of the Hotspot Compiler or to wait for the new update of Sun JVM.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing us to the right direction!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5581</link>
		<author>Remy</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5581</guid>
		<description>Daniel: Please let me know how it goes after checking your logs against the problems I have described above. If there are no matches, feel free to file a bug or try to get some help from one of Eclipse's support avenues like the newsgroup and/or IRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel: Please let me know how it goes after checking your logs against the problems I have described above. If there are no matches, feel free to file a bug or try to get some help from one of Eclipse&#8217;s support avenues like the newsgroup and/or IRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Le Berre</title>
		<link>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5580</link>
		<author>Daniel Le Berre</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 06:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hantsuki.org/2008/06/26/eclipse-just-crashed-so-im-going-to-file-a-bug-now/#comment-5580</guid>
		<description>I confirm that Eclipse 3.4 is currently unusable on Linux 64 (Mandriva).

I use Eclipse under the same distribution (Mandriva) on both a 32 bits and 64 bits platform. 

Eclipse3.4 works like a charm on the former will it crashes after a few minutes of use on the latter (JVM bug). I cannot access that machine right now, so I cannot confirm the origin of the problem)

It is a show stopper for me because I run only 64 bits software on that machine.

Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confirm that Eclipse 3.4 is currently unusable on Linux 64 (Mandriva).</p>
<p>I use Eclipse under the same distribution (Mandriva) on both a 32 bits and 64 bits platform. </p>
<p>Eclipse3.4 works like a charm on the former will it crashes after a few minutes of use on the latter (JVM bug). I cannot access that machine right now, so I cannot confirm the origin of the problem)</p>
<p>It is a show stopper for me because I run only 64 bits software on that machine.</p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
